David Jeffery, “Review: Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research”

Jeffery reviews (and has submitted this review to Political Studies Review) Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research by Widerquist, Anguera, Vanderborght, and de Wispelaere, which consolidates significant basic income research into 74 chapters split into the categories of freedom, justice, reciprocity and exploitation, feminism, economics, post-productivism, implementation, institutions, and politics. The book also includes the major critiques of basic income, mostly in feminism and economics, but Jeffery argues that as a whole the research has been too philosophical and not empirical enough.

David Jeffery, “Review: Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research”, What’s David Thinking?, 24 February 2015.

 

 

Cathy Orlando, “Canada can lead North America with Carbon Fee and Dividend”

Cathy Orlando, “Canada can lead North America with Carbon Fee and Dividend”

Orlando’s response to an article about President Obama vetoing the Keystone XL Pipeline bill encourages Canada to lead on climate change policy by implementing a carbon fee-and-dividend program that would take carbon fees and distribute them out to all citizens in a kind of basic income.

Cathy Orlando, “Canada can lead North America with Carbon Fee and Dividend”, The Windsor Star, 4 March 2015.

 

Nathan Schneider, “Why the Tech Elite is Getting Behind Universal Basic Income”

Schneider’s piece excellently discusses the swaths of techies who are joining the basic income movement and their reasons for doing so. A basic income has the sort of simplicity heralded in the tech world, and it could free people up to spend more time tinkering and creating venture capital. Further, Schneider highlights the differing political arguments, from libertarians to progressives to Marxists.

Nathan Schneider, “Why the Tech Elite is Getting Behind Universal Basic Income”, P2P Foundation, 24 February 2015.