News; News & Events

CANADA: Quebec is implementing a means-tested benefit, not a basic income

The province of Quebec, in Canada, has been fostering conversations around basic income and even, at a certain point in 2016, has appointed a long-time supporter of basic income, François Blais, as Minister of Employment and Social Solidarity. Although the term “guaranteed minimum income” has been used in an indiscriminate fashion ever since 2014, there has never been an actual mandate for Blais to implement basic income in Quebec.


In fact, what is being implemented in Quebec at the moment differs considerably from a basic income, as defined by the Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN). According to Dorothée Boccanfuso, Chair of Quebec’s Expert Committee on Guaranteed Minimum Income, the new plan’s definition is presented as “any system that offers a guarantee of monetary resources for all, with the amount of those resources being related to a minimum threshold”. This expert committee has been tasked to make recommendations to François Blais, on income support, having produced a report. The proposed scheme has, therefore, kept existing social security system’s properties of means-testing and incentives to work, the latter strengthened through “a greater reward be provided for work efforts, through a major increase to the work premium”.


The enhanced economic support scheme is intended to widen its coverage, aiming at defining a “benchmark threshold”, a means-tested minimum guaranteed income to support “persons with no employment restrictions, for persons 65 and over and for people with disabilities”. There has been, clearly, an effort to cover more people with social support, trying to fill in the gaps and effectively reduce poverty levels, but still not embracing unconditionality. As the Expert Committee on Guaranteed Minimum Income puts it:


“The Committee wants a society that is free of poverty, but this wish can only be achieved by helping persons who are able to re-enter the labour market, pursue education and training or, more generally, better integrate into society. In the Committee’s view, poverty is not a status, but rather a situation and those who are in it must be helped to get out. The income support system must guarantee the minimum resources required for vulnerable persons to meet their immediate needs. Above all, it must eliminate barriers preventing these persons from escaping poverty.”


So, the social security program sought is not an unconditional basic income. However, some media sources are portraying it in misleading headlines such as “Quebec to offer basic income for 84000 people unable to work” and “Basic income to be given to 84000 people in Canada”. One the other hand, a few anti-poverty groups have clearly criticised the support scheme, calling out for a true unconditional support system. According to Serge Petitclerc, representing the group Collectif pour un Quebec sans pauvreté, the “guaranteed minimum income (…) should be unconditional and it should apply to the entire population”.


More information at:

Kate McFarland, “Quebec, Canada: Liberal Party’s Ideas Forum to address Minimum Income”, Basic Income News, September 18th 2016

Stanislas Jourdan, “Québec, Canada: Minister of Employment appointed to work on basic income”, Basic Income News, February 4th 2016

Yannick Vanderborght, “Québec, Canada: Minister of Employment for the provincial government reiterates his support for basic income”, Basic Income News, July 17th 2014

Loulla-Mae Eleftheriou-Smith, “Basic income to be given to 84000 people in Canada”, Independent, 11th December 2017

Karina Laframboise, “Quebec to offer basic income for 84000 people unable to work”, CBCNews, 10th December 2017

Malcolm Torry, “What’s a definition? And how should we define Basic Income?”, BIEN Congress in Lisbon, 2017

About Andre Coelho

André Coelho has written 310 articles.

Activist. Engineer. Musician. For the more beautiful world our hearts know it's possible.

The views expressed in this Op-Ed piece are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of Basic Income News or BIEN. BIEN and Basic Income News do not endorse any particular policy, but Basic Income News welcomes discussion from all points of view in its Op-Ed section.


  • Trev

    Sounds like the same old outdated notion of the “undeserving poor” to me, as exists in England. Funny we never hear of the ‘undeserving rich’ !

  • Pierre Madden

    Québec will be increasing welfare payments to the deserving poor and are calling this Basic Income. The increase, to take place over 5 years will bring these worthy beneficiaries who are unable to work up to the “poverty level” set at the “market basket measure.” This is what is described as “escaping” poverty. The undeserving poor, defined as those deemed able to work will have to make do with 55% of the poverty line revenue. This, according to the government, should cover undefined “immediate needs”, which are about half of “minimum needs.”
    The use of the term Basic Income in this context is pure propaganda meant to feed into the popular prejudice that the poor should be punished for their poverty, a doctrine actively supported by the welfare system.

  • Dear Andre Coelho,
    Great work what you do for the Uncoditional Basic Income for Everybody. Thank you very much indeed.
    We have to get it right.
    But we will get it right, there is no other way.
    Joseph Beuys said: “Money has to flow like a bloodstream through the body of our society.”
    We will get there, I am sure.
    Thank you for your contributions in that direction.
    Louwrien Wijers, NL

  • Albin Foro

    Has anybody looked at the requirement of the “housing component” of the Solidarity benefit that the applicant must obtain an RL-31 slip from the landlord?

    Helping a Solidarity-eligible Montreal resident file tax for last year, I was surprised at this obigation that is probably depriving thousands of low-income citizens in “grey market” housing from $50 to $70 per month of Solidarity payments. They cannot even ask a landlord who is probably not claiming the rental income or paying any tax, to provide an RL-31 for Revenue Canada to use for Solidarity, which would be an admission of rent received. So they have to file for minimal Solidarity without any “housing component” at a substantial loss of entitlement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.