Academic Articles; From the web

Report: “Pilot Lessons: How to design a basic income pilot project for Ontario”

The Government of Ontario plans to move forward with a pilot study of a basic income guarantee, to begin by April 2017.

On September 20, four researchers — Evelyn L. Forget (Professor of Economics at the University of Manitoba), Dylan Marando (PhD Student at the University of Toronto), Tonya Surman (founding CEO of the Centre for Social Innovation), and Michael Crawford Urban (Policy Associate at the Mowat Centre) — released a report called “Pilot Lessons: How to design a basic income pilot project for Ontario”. “Pilot Lessons” offers recommendations to the Ontario government on the basis of previous trials of basic income guarantee programs. It also calls for a greater focus on the impact of a guaranteed income on innovation and entrepreneurship.

The report begins by glossing the meaning of the term ‘basic income’ as it is used by the authors (“basic income is best conceptualized as a policy whereby a government guarantees, to all of its citizens, a regular predictable income sufficient to live a basic but dignified life”), distinguishing between the “demogrant” and “negative income tax” models.

The authors go on to overview past experiments on basic income, especially those conducted in the United States and Canada during the 1970s.

Based on this review of past experience, they identify four lessons:

1. Vary the parameters (e.g. eligibility conditions, amount of income guarantee, tax-back rates), but don’t vary them too much.

2. Communicate the results of experiments through scientific, not political, channels. The authors state that “science and politics don’t mix well”. For example, they point to the politically-driven promulgation of the alleged correlation between receipt of a basic income and increased divorce rates following the United States experiments in the 1970s. This contributed to the deterioration of interest in the policy, especially among Republicans.

3. Don’t overlook indirect benefits of basic income that might be observed in experiments. For example, the authors note Evelyn Forget’s investigation of Manitoba’s “Mincome” experiment: Forget demonstrated that the basic income guarantee in Dauphine corresponded to lower hospitalization rates and increased high school graduation rates.

4. Don’t assume that a decline in the time spent in paid employment implies a decline in the time spent in socially valuable work (e.g. consider whether the time is spent instead in childcare, continued education, volunteer work, etc).

In the next chapter, the authors describe major changes in the labor market that pose important differences between the present context and that of the past experiments, such as the increase in precarious labor and rise of automation. They also argue that, by decreasing the risk associated with leaving a job or starting a business, a basic income could facilitate entrepreneurship and innovation.

The report concludes with 14 recommendations for the design of a pilot study.

The full report is available for download.


Reviewed by Dawn Howard

Photo: Vancouver Science World CC BY 2.0 Franco Ng

About Kate McFarland

Kate McFarland has written 512 articles.

Former lead writer and editor of Basic Income News.

The views expressed in this Op-Ed piece are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of Basic Income News or BIEN. BIEN and Basic Income News do not endorse any particular policy, but Basic Income News welcomes discussion from all points of view in its Op-Ed section.

One comment

  • Darlene

    Another report in which people on ODSP are left out and “youth” are highlighted. Again.
    I guess more than 450,000 Ontario residents are merely invisible despite how experts are told again and again that some of the most destitute and poverty stricken people in the country are on disability.
    But let’s focus on youth. Let’s highlight people who are perfectly able bodied, have not lived in poverty for say, 20 years where suicide is seriously contemplated every single month, where homelessness is a growing real possibility.
    This truly makes me despair and I am losing a lot of hope that I once had with a basic income.
    Let’s all deal with the youth, the children, and the working families. People who don’t need it.
    Let’s all focus for three or four years on this while those on ODSP die of stress related disease, suicide, and crushing mental and emotional issues.
    I think it’s disgusting really.
    It’s strange how 450,000 people are continually invisible.
    I once liked this idea, now it’s seeming more and more like a political ploy.
    Give able bodied youth money they don’t need, and watch this project go down the tubes even further in the public eye. Watch it get quashed after one year, while ODSP recipients live with the consequences of knowing there was a chance of a life saver being thrown to them but it drifted away.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.