News; News & Events

UNITED STATES: Fund Manager Bill Gross Endorses Basic Income

Last Wednesday, May 4, billionaire bond manager Bill Gross (of Janus Capital) made waves when he endorsed universal basic income in his Monthly Investment Outlook – or, perhaps more accurately, declared a UBI to be inevitable.

Mr. Gross, like many other commentators on current economic trends, foresees massive job loss due to automation:

Virtually every industry in existence is likely to become less labor-intensive in future years as new technology is assimilated into existing business models. Transportation is a visible example as computer driven vehicles soon will displace many truckers and bus/taxi drivers. Millions of jobs will be lost over the next 10-15 years. But medicine, manufacturing and even service intensive jobs are at risk. Investment managers too! Not only blue collar but now white collar professionals are being threatened by technological change.

He is critical of the idea, currently en vogue, that the appropriate response is to make higher education more accessible and affordable — submitting that a college degree might “better prepare students to be contestants on Jeopardy” but not necessarily lead to better jobs or more economic growth.

What, then, should be the alternative? Well, here’s what Mr. Gross says:

Instead we should spend money where it’s needed most – our collapsing infrastructure for instance, health care for an aging generation and perhaps on a revolutionary new idea called UBI – Universal Basic Income. If more and more workers are going to be displaced by robots, then they will need money to live on, will they not? And if that strikes you as a form of socialism, I would suggest we get used to it.

Indeed, he later goes so far as to assert, “The question is how high this UBI should be and how to pay for it, not whether it’s coming in the next decade. It is.”

On the question of how to financial a UBI, Mr. Gross recommends that central banks print more money – the idea popularly referred to as “helicopter money” and promoted in Europe as “QE for the People.”

Within hours, Mr. Gross’ proclamations led to a proliferation of news stories on basic income – including reports in Reuters, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and CNN Money, to mention only a few.

Matt Levine (in his Bloomberg View column “Money Stuff“) drew upon some personal anecdotes from Bill Gross to common on the common objection-cum-question “Would people stop working if they had a basic income?”:

Imagine a young Bill Gross, offered a basic income, free of the constraints of needing to earn a living. Would he still have become an obsessive bond manager? Yes of course he would have, come on. Gross has been open about the fact that he’s not in bond investing for the money; he’s in it for the fame. And there is no universal basic income of fame, though I guess Twitter is getting us pretty close.

Meanwhile, other authors and commentators took a skeptical stance. Fortune columnist Chris Matthews, for example, questioned the political feasibility of UBI in present day America, and Myles Udland, writing for Business Insider, claimed that a UBI would not be welcomed because “in the US we have attached a stigma to receiving certain types of government assistance, and the sociopolitical hurdles to a basic income program are very high.”

To be fair, Udland probably penned this criticism before he had chance to the read David Calnitsky’s article in the Canadian Journal of Sociology, “‘More Normal than Welfare”: The Mincome Experiment, Stigma, and Community Experience,” reported upon in Basic Income News last week. Calnitsky’s article provides empirical support to what many have already expected: since it is given to everyone — “obscuring the distinctions between the ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor,” as Calnitsky writes — a basic income should substantially diminish the stigma associated with the receipt of government monies.

Is basic income nonetheless too radical to be accepted in the States? At the very least, given the quickly burgeoning interest in the idea — and more and more prominent endorsements like that of Bill Gross — it seems premature to rule out its eventual widespread acceptance, which perhaps might happen sooner than we think.

Image Credit: Sequence Media Group

Thanks to my supporters on Patreon. (Click the link to see how you too can support my work for Basic Income News.) 

About Kate McFarland

Kate McFarland has written 512 articles.

Former lead writer and editor of Basic Income News.

The views expressed in this Op-Ed piece are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of Basic Income News or BIEN. BIEN and Basic Income News do not endorse any particular policy, but Basic Income News welcomes discussion from all points of view in its Op-Ed section.


  • godenich

    ‘On the question of how to financial a UBI, Mr. Gross recommends that central banks print more money — the idea popularly referred to as “helicopter money.”’

    On one hand, we know central bank helicopter money creates inflation that shrinks the money in your wallet and causes prices to rise. This makes it harder for working families to make ends meet since there is no guarantee that wages will also rise in the same manner. In addition, every dollar of green-seal Federal Reserve Notes is legal tender that must be backed up by an equal amount of Treasury Security Debt, usually sold through Primary Dealer Banks to other countries by the FOMC. This increases the national debt and the amount of taxes that must be raised from taxpaying citizens to pay the annual interest expense.

    On the other hand, replacing green-seal Federal Reserve Notes with a greater amount of Red-Seal Treasury Notes tells a slightly different story.

  • BBB

    I read Mr Gross’ newsletter for investment advice, not redistribution philosophy. People get their esteem by producing or servicing something/someone thus I don’t see a need for UBI. And if college doesn’t teach you anything to get gainfully employed then I suspect you don’t need a college degree anyhow.

  • JJ

    In the 1960s, Dr. King and conservative economist Milton Friedman agreed on one thing: the need to implement a policy of the Basic Income. Dr. King wanted an immediate end to poverty, and Friedman wanted to save capitalism from its reckless instability, especially regarding the systemic undermining of consumer demand.

    In 1976, an Alaskan Governor created a Basic Income (Alaska’s Permanent Fund), which provides annual checks to residents from the interest earned on oil investments. The same could be done for the incipient renewable energy sector: Fund a Renewable Energy Public Dividend through feed-in tariffs. It’s not that hard if you really want it.

    By, the way, this idea is as old as the American Revolution: Thomas Paine was the first to suggest it in the 1790s, as a remedy for the imposition of the system of landed property (aristocracy).

    There is also the option of imposing a Maximum Income Tax on the rich. They have been looting the public’s assets and resources for decades now. They owe the public Reparations for damages. You know it’s true.

  • He does make a fair point – it’s impossible to fight back what’s inevitable. As technology advances, a universal basic income is going to happen.

  • Jaffo Nerr

    Communist twit!

    We have a guarantee – THE CONSTITUTION!

    If you think you need anything besides FREEDOM! it’s time to find another country.

    • Servitude for the poor is not freedom. It’s slavery, even if you do it by giving the rich the property rights to all the resources.
      Presumably you’re talking about the US constitution, nothing in it prohibits Basic Income.

  • Jph

    A Basic Income is inevitable yes, however is will be funded by taxing ownership claims.

    If one claims ownership of a resource they are precluding others use of it, and yet they did not create the world or our resources, therefore they will be compelled to compensate the rest of us for the resource they now monopolize.

    Further in a effort to rebalance the gross wealth inequity the failed monopolistic corporate capitalism has left us in, all income over a million will be taxed at 90%.

    A world this far out of balance is not sustainable, or free.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.