Johan Nygren — previously featured on Basic Income News for his work on BitNation and its application to basic income — is now designing a system he calls “Resilience,” which is capable of implementing what he describes as a “Darwinian basic income.”
Although he supports basic income, Nygren is pessimistic about the possibility of a state-funded policy, since he believes that “cryptography dis-intermediates the very ability to exert centralized control.”
Nygren has developed his Resilience system as an alternative:
I’ve been working on designing new types of incentives that could enable universal basic income even in a world where taxation has become impossible. The idea behind the system, that I call Resilience, is to reward people and companies for choosing to consume from entities that donate to the system. When they do so, they will inherit what I call a Taxeme, that will extract the same amount of wealth when someone else consumes from them. The system is based on paying it forward, and rewards people for spreading a behavior of donating part of their income.
Those who pay forward a Taxeme will get rewards from future people and companies whose transactions and business grow outwards from where the Taxeme originated, forming a perpetual wealth redistribution cycle that is driven not by violence, but by something similar to the golden rule.
Nygren explains Resilience in a recent post on Ethereum, including videos and sample code.
Johan Nygren, “Crypto-states make taxation impossible – Darwinian Basic Income is the Future,” Ethereum, June 14, 2016.
Thanks to my supporters on Patreon. (To see how you too can support my work for Basic Income News, click the link.)
This is beautiful and something as a farmer’s son that’s needing support to embrace earth friendly practices, I’ve been pushing for, for a long time. The reality of good food production is that it needs to be treated as a nessecity not a commodity. I was working on having a simple ethics score that is multiplied over all financial transactions. eg. 1.13 x $a will be a greater return 0.89 x $a will be a smaller return. We all have ethics scores that are created by promoting and challenging each other’s behaviour. Kind of like what’s encouraged in a Tibetan monastery.
I am just a farmer though.