ITALY: Conflict Over Report of a Basic Income Experiment in Lombardy

ITALY: Conflict Over Report of a Basic Income Experiment in Lombardy

ANSA reported on May 12 that Lombardy Governor Maroni may introduce a basic income experiment in Lombardy, Italy.  However, Sandro Gobetti, Coordinator of Basic Income Network Italia, suggests that these reports are unfounded and untrue, saying that Maroni has no intention of implementing a basic income scheme as defined by BIEN.  For a more clear picture of the basic income situation in Italy, please visit Basic Income Network Italia’s website.  Gobetti’s cautionary explanation can be found in the comments of this post, while ANSA’s article is printed below:

 

(ANSA) – Milan, May 12 – Lombardy Governor Roberto Maroni said Monday that his executive intends to introduce, on an experimental basis, a basic-income benefit to ensure all families in the region have enough money to be able to pay for basic necessities. Maroni said he intended to use 220 million euros from from the European Social Fund (ESF) for the initiative. “In Lombardy I want to bring in the first experiment of the basic income, reserved for citizens who are resident in Lombardy, and consistent with the aims of the European Social Fund”. To read ANSA’s article, click here.

Further, a discussion in Italian of this basic income experiment is taking place on Reddit. To read and join the discussion, click here.

 

PERUGIA and ASSISI, Italy: 5 Star March for a Citizen’s Income, 9 May 2015.

PERUGIA and ASSISI, Italy: 5 Star March for a Citizen’s Income, 9 May 2015.

The 5 Star march for a citizen’s income from Perugia to Assisi on 9th May.

It starts off at 12 noon from Giardini del Frontone, Borgo XX Giugno, Perugia. The arrival is scheduled for around 5:00 pm to 6:00 pm in Viale Patrono d’Italia by the Basilica of Santa Maria degli Angeli, Assisi.

See the details at: https://www.beppegrillo.it/en/2015/05/08/marcia5stelle_5_star_march_for_3.html

Their concept of a citizen income is not exactly same as an unconditional basic income. Please see on the analysis of their concept at: https://basicincome.org/news/2013/03/italy-5-star-movement-and-the-confusing-proposal-of-a-citizens-income/

ITALY: 65,000 people support anti-mafia campaign for a ‘dignity income’

ITALY: 65,000 people support anti-mafia campaign for a ‘dignity income’

Several Italian civil society groups have rallied to a 100-day campaign which promotes the concept of a ‘dignity income’ as a way to counter mafia power.

There was a resolution at the European Parliament on 16 October 2010 which stressed the important “role of minimum income in combating poverty and promoting an inclusive society in Europe”, and recommended that all EU countries adopt a minimum income scheme. Italy is still one of the few EU countries (along with Hungary, Bulgaria and Greece) which has not yet done so.

In order to remedy this problem, a new alliance of civil society organisations started a campaign called “100 days for a dignity income” on March 13th. The campaign has a simple goal: get a minimum income passed into law within 100 days.

The leaders of the campaign argue: “It is not impossible, our proposal is not unrealistic: there are several bills pending at the Palazzo Madama (the Italian Senate building).”

The campaign is led by the 20-year-old anti-mafia organisation, Libera, later joined by several anti-poverty networks. In a press release, Libera stressed the relevance of minimum income as a key tool against the Mafia’s blackmailing of the poor’:

“The Minimum or Citizen’s Income, is also a key tool for fighting organised crime in a period of crisis and increasing poverty and social inequality. It removes oxygen from those who exploit the need to work and turn it into economic blackmail, which fuels criminal networks who then take advantage of poverty for their own businesses. A minimum income law would make people less vulnerable in the face of those who want to exploit their needs and vulnerabilities.”

A first step towards basic income in Italy

Behind the concept of “dignity income” the campaign is the idea of “a minimum income support that provides a safety net for those who cannot work or go to a job that can guarantee a decent income or do not have access to social security systems,” says the manifesto. It is therefore not exactly a basic income as we understand it.

In the context of Italian politics however, a means-tested and conditional minimum income is often considered as a necessary first step towards a universal basic income.

The Basic Income Network Italia (BIN-Italy) supports the campaign because it goes in the right direction. BIN-Italia will foster public initiatives, debates, seminars and other meetings to raise awareness both amongst public opinion and decision makers of the necessity of a guaranteed basic income nn a country where 10 million people live in relative poverty (16.6% of the total population) and more than 6 million, (9.9% of the population), in absolute poverty.

After 30 days of campaigning, 65,000 citizens have already supported the new campaign by signing a petition to the national parliament. The organisers aim is for 100,000 signatures. Two years ago, a similar citizens’ initiative received more than the necessary 50,000 signatures to be discussed at parliament, but was never given a serious hearing.

This time, as with the last campaign, many politicians and political parties have expressed their support for the campaign, including political parties Sinistra Ecologia Libertà (Left Ecology Liberty), Movimento 5 stelle (5 Stars Movement) and Rifondazione Comunista (Refounded Communist Party) and one of the main metalworkers labour unions, FIOM.

Moreover, the mayors of the cities of Udine, Cerveteri, Monterotondo have not only signed the petition but also presented a petition at their City Councils for their cities to officially promote the campaign.

However, the Minister of Labour Giuliano Poletti remains unconvinced. Just a few days after the start of the campaign he publicly opposed it, claiming that a minimum income would “cost many billions, and be unsustainable for the current national budget”.

With contribution from Emanuele Murra

Emanuele Murra, “Ragioni Differenti Per Una Proposta Condivisa: Reddito Di Base E Consenso Per Intersezione”

ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Since its formulation by the Collectif Charles Fourier in 1984, the idea of allocation universelle / basic income / citizens income has produced a deep debate and obtaining consensus from intellectuals, philosophers and politicians of very different frameworks. The international literature on the subject shows the existence of a kind of theoretical agreement that, with suitable expression, Rawls has defined as overlapping consensus. In front of the social and economic changes and the ideological and economical crisis of the welfare state, this paper highlights the importance to reshape the social policies trough a broad consensus, wider of the one that a political majority can offer. A reformation of the existing guarantees of social rights need a policy that can be sustained from ( and continuing to embrace) different views of the world. The basic income, this beautiful, disarmingly, simple idea (to use the words of Philippe Van Parijs) , already obtained a discreet theoretical overlapping consensus and it is possible – for the author desirable – that it will soon carry around such a consensus on the more concrete level of political decision.

ITALIAN ABSTRACT: Sin dalla sua formulazione da parte del Collectif Charles Fourier nel 1984, l’idea di allocation universelle / basic income / reddito di base / reddito minimo universale ha pro- dotto intorno a sé un dibattito sempre più ampio e un consenso variegato da parte di intellettuali, filosofi e politici che pure si richiamano a quadri concettuali, mo- delli valoriali e dottrine comprensive a volte molto diverse tra loro. La letteratura internazionale sul tema mostra l’esistenza di un dibattito poco noto in Italia, dibat- tito nel quale è possibile riscontrare, almeno a livello teorico, ampie convergenze raggiunte a partire da valutazioni ideali differenti. Una forma di accordo che, con felice espressione, Rawls ha definito overlapping consensus, cioè consenso per intersezio- ne. Questo lavoro cercherà di evidenziare come, davanti agli importanti mutamenti sociali ed economici degli ultimi anni, la crisi ideologica e ideale del welfare state richieda un ripensamento delle forme di garanzia dei diritti sociali per il quale è necessario un ampio e trasversale consenso attorno a una policy che possa essere sostenuta proprio a partire da (e continuando ad abbracciare) visioni del mondo differenti. Il reddito di base, questa beautiful, disarmigly, simple idea (per usare le pa- role di Philippe Van Parijs), può già vantare a livello teorico un discreto overlapping consensus, ed è possibile – per l’autore auspicabile – che esso possa presto convo- gliare attorno a sé un simile consenso anche al livello più concreto della decisione politica.

Emanuele Murra, “Ragioni Differenti Per Una Proposta Condivisa: Reddito Di Base E Consenso Per Intersezione [Different Reasons For a Shared Proposal: Basic Income and Overlapping Consensus].” Centro Einaudi, Laboratorio di Politica Comparata e Filosofia Pubblica Working Paper-LPF no. 3, 2014.

Centro Einaudi