As we spend so much time debating who’s right about whether robots will take most of our jobs and whether there’ll be a need for a basic income, other arguments for such a policy get “crowded out” of the discussion.
The non-productive among us could be very busy writing poetry, composing music, playing it, or engaging in other pursuits. What makes one non-productive isn’t a lack of effort or initiative but the lack of a market for their goods or services.
Less work would result in more social isolation, as well as less purpose and meaning in people’s lives. However, many people don’t work for social connections — they work for money. And they may be able to find more connections, meaning, and purpose spending less time at work.
Experiments on basic income encourage asking whether the policy “works” — but whether a basic income “works” might not be the right question to ask. (Originally written for an editorial in USBIG Network NewsFlash.)
By Karl Widerquist, co-chair BIEN, and Louise Haagh, co-chair BIEN BIEN has made great strides in the last few years. Two years ago, our main goals were to charter BIEN as a legally recognized non-profit organization, to organize the 2016 Congress in Seoul Korea, and to expand Basic Income News. We succeeded in all three. The Seoul Congress will be