News; News & Events

UK: Trades Union Congress to vote on UBI motion

The 148th annual UK Trades Union Congress will be held this year in Brighton from September 11 to 14 — and will include a vote on whether to endorse universal basic income.

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) is, as it were, a “union of unions”. As the TUC itself puts it, “Just as individual workers benefit by joining together in a union, so unions gain strength by acting together through the TUC. The TUC brings unions together to draw up common policies on issues that matter to people at work.”

The TUC represents a total of more than 5.8 million workers from 51 unions. Its member unions range in size from small specialists unions of a few hundred members to the UK’s largest trade union, Unite, with around 1.4 million members. The TUC states that its mission “to be a high profile organisation that campaigns successfully for trade union aims and values; assists trade unions to increase membership and effectiveness; cuts out wasteful rivalry; and promotes trade union solidarity.”

The largest member, Unite, endorsed basic income this past July. It has now introduced a motion supporting basic income for consideration at this year’s Congress.

This is the full text of the motion on which the Congress will be voting (available in the Congress’ Preliminary Agenda, pp. 49-50):

Universal Basic Income

Congress notes the growing popularity of the idea of a ‘Universal Basic Income’ with a variety of models being discussed here and around the world. Congress recognises the need for a rebuilding of a modern social security system for men and women as part of tackling poverty and inequality.

Congress believes that the TUC should argue for a progressive system that incorporates the basis of a Universal Basic Income system paid individually and that is complementary to comprehensive public services and childcare provision.

Congress believes that such a system would be easier to administer and easier for people to navigate than the current system which has been made increasingly punitive and has effectively been used to stigmatise benefit claimants. The operation of sanctions pushes people into destitution for trivial reasons.

Congress recognises that until the housing crisis is resolved there would also be a need for supplementary benefits to support people on low incomes with high housing costs and that there will always be a need for supplementary benefits for disabled people.

The transition from our current system to any new system that incorporates these principles should always leave people with lower incomes better off.

Congress believes that our social security system must work in tandem with our agenda for strong trade unions and employment rights and secure, decently and properly paid work.


Reviewed by Robert Gordon

Photo CC BY-NC 2.0 Toban B.

This basic income news made possible in part by Kate’s supporters on Patreon

Kate McFarland

About Kate McFarland

Kate McFarland has written 500 articles.

I was a statistician, then a philosopher, then a journalist for a certain Basic Income News, and I have never been the sort to wed myself to any specific position or career path. (I have always chosen to remain in the precariat for this reason: my sense of duty is strong enough that I’d risk imperiling my own self-development if I were to accept a permanent position.) If you want to learn more about what I’m about, and how I see my ideal roles in the basic income community going forth, read the “cover letter” of sorts that is my Patreon homepage (updated November 2017).

Share Button

One comment

  • Nancy Campbell

    Now that our ever-expanding GDP has reached the multi-trillions of dollars range here in the USA, the judicious insertion of money into the economic system becomes a major priority. Federal governments reserve the right to create money. Money doesn’t sprout up all by itself, like the leaves on a tree. It must be produced and introduced into the economy.

    Money isn’t wealth, per se. It’s more of a “tool” that measures and transports the wealth. Wealth, (i.e., GDP) is more and more people, producing and consuming more and more things. Present-day banking transactional fees collect the available money “tools” out of the flow of the economy faster than ever before.

    We live on this planet that’s in a “Goldilocks Zone,” where things are “just right” to support life as we know it. For us, keeping things just right is the key. Making it possible for each individual state, (where the people live,) to disburse New Money Grants to adult members of humanity would be one way to get things just right and to keep the expanding economy on an even keel from now on.

    Calling this a: Goldilocks Economic Monetary Adjustment, (GEMA,) for the GDP, sounds good to me. The term “Basic Income Plan” is a bit of a misnomer, I think..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *